Tag: art history

  • Marie Laurencin’s Ethereal Women

    Marie Laurencin’s Ethereal Women

    When I first saw the work of Marie Laurencin I wanted to melt into each painting and become part of the ethereal intimacy she created with every composition. Was that a lot? Because this is another artist that was a lot, but in a more subtle way than artists like Tamara de Lempicka. Marie grew up under the thumb of her mother, battled depression and loneliness throughout her life, established her career among domineering men, and openly represented queerness at the turn of the 20th century. Above all, Marie was unapologetically Marie. 

    Marie’s Childhood

    Marie Laurencin was born in Paris on October 31, 1883 to Pauline Laurencin. She was also the illegitimate child of politician Alfred Toulet. Even though he visited on occasion, she didn’t know he was her father and despised his presence. Marie didn’t learn the truth until she was 21. 

    It was otherwise just Marie and her mother living alone. Pauline was controlling, but distant, and had her own ideas of what her young daughter should grow up to be. Marie was well-read and began drawing at an early age, but her mother disapproved of her creative efforts. She sometimes destroyed Marie’s drawings because she wanted her to become a teacher. However, Marie was uninterested in school and did so poorly that becoming a teacher was out of the question. 

    Portrait of Marie Laurencin's Mother 1906
    Marie Laurencin, The Artist’s Mother, 1906
    This portrait makes it pretty clear how Marie felt about her mom.

    Marie’s (Successful) Education

    After her failures in school Marie started a series of self portraits, but they were criticized for being narcissist. This criticism followed her later into her career as the women she painted were said to all look like her. Her women also had smooth, porcelain skin – possibly in part because she studied porcelain painting at the École de Sèvres at age 18. 

    Marie Laurencin Self Portrait 1904
    Marie Laurencin, Self Portrait, 1904.

    In 1903 Marie studied at the Académie Humbert to practice drawing, painting, and printmaking. There she learned oil painting, a skill that later helped her enter the orbit of established male artists like Pablo Picasso and Robert Delaunay. She also he met fellow artist George Braque at the Académie. 

    During this time, Marie began attending Natalie Barney’s “famous neo-Sapphic gatherings” where lesbian and bisexual women would socialize and talk about creativity and how it related to female desire. Being a part of this circle was a huge influence on Marie’s life and art.

    Marie’s first attempted printmaking in 1904 with erotic illustrations of women. It was around this time that Marie made her own attraction to women clear. 

    Marie Laurencin Le Barque Etching 1911
    Marie Laurencin, Le Barque, Etching, 1911

    A Queer View Among Men

    In 1907, when Marie was 24, Braque introduced her to Picasso, who then introduced her to the poet Guillaume Apollinaire. They began a passionate relationship that lasted six years. His admiration for her helped to launch her career as he encouraged her to explore her own style and wrote glowing reviews of her work. Her connections with the creatives in the Parisian avant-garde movement also helped her get into some of the best shows in Paris. 

    This doesn’t mean that her male counterparts handed her an art career. They saw her as innocent and naive, but she was smart enough to recognize the opportunity to promote her work. While she explored Cubism at first, the further she delved into her own soft, ethereal style, the further her work stood in contrast to the stark, masculine work of artists like Picasso.

    Marie Laurencin Les Jeunes Filles 1911
    Marie Laurencin, Les Jeune Filles, 1911.
    Picasso, Sitzende Frau, 1909
    Picasso, Sitzende Frau, 1909

    Also in 1907, Marie had her first exhibition at the Salon des Indépendants. This show was often associated with the Cubists, but she did not want to be seen as part of the Cubist movement. “Instead, she drew from the dreamlike imagery of modern poets,…and the soft colors of Impressionists such as Auguste Renoir.”

    In 1911 Marie “was the only woman to have work included in the Maison Cubiste”, a show that included artists like Marcel Duchamp. The public literally attacked the exhibit and she and another artist physically guarded the show with umbrellas.

    Marie Laurencin, La Danse, 1913
    Marie Laurencin, La Danse, 1913

    The following year, Marie showed at the Section d’Or exhibition at Paris’s Galerie Boëtie. By this time, she and Apollinaire had begun to drift apart. He was overbearing and controlling (kind of like mom!), and by now Marie had established herself as an artist. When the relationship ended in 1913, he did not handle it well and refused to acknowledge that they were no longer together. 

    Marie Laurencin Moves On

    Marie’s mother died in 1913 around the time she ended her relationship with Apollinaire. The next year she married German painter Otto von Waëtjen, supposedly because he reminded her of her mother. It was said that he saw himself as the better artist and saw his wife as beneath him. Unsurprisingly, Marie was unhappy during this time, but at least it made Apollinaire finally accept that she had moved on. 

    Marie Laurencin, Judith, 1930
    Marie Laurencin, Judith, 1930
    Otto von Waetjen, Two Elegant Young Ladies, 1925
    Otto von Waetjen, Two Elegant Young Ladies, 1925

    When World War I broke out, Marie and her husband moved to Spain to escape the growing contempt for Germans and stayed there for almost five years. Marie missed Paris and lost interest in painting while in Spain. Even though she was depressed, she became involved in Dadaism and was part of the avant-garde movement in Spain. She also discovered an affinity for Francisco Goya’s work, especially the women he painted. Marie and her husband then moved to Dusseldorf in 1919. Their marriage deteriorated due to Otto’s drinking and Marie filed for divorce.

    In 1920 Marie returned to Paris, refining her work into what she’s remembered for today. She enjoyed financial stability as her paintings became more popular and sold her work on her own terms, much to the chagrin of her dealer. Marie charged more for work she found boring and often gave pieces away to her friends. She charged twice as much for portraits of men and charged brunettes more than blondes. Supposedly she only painted children she liked. 

    Marie on Her Own

    Marie had lovers over the years, but never remarried. She devoted her time to honing her craft and her energy to her closest friends. It was rumored that she had both male and female lovers and she openly associated with lesbian groups, but this was never a detriment to her reputation. 

    After the war Marie spent more time pursuing her own artistic ideals. She painted the pastel portraits of women we recognize today. Her work also became more erotic, “often showing women kissing and laying together” as she continued to explore her identity as a queer woman. 

    Marie Laurencin, Les Deux Amies, 1925
    Marie Laurencin, Les Deux Amies, 1925

    Amidst the masculine energy of Cubist painters she painted the intimacy and deep relationships between women with organic forms and pastel palettes. She explored her own desires and sexuality with each composition, giving her subjects control of the viewer’s gaze with eye contact. Where a male artist would make similar scenes voyeuristic, Marie challenged the viewer’s intent by acknowledging their presence. 

    By 1930 Marie was a popular portrait painter. In 1931 she helped found La Société des femmes artistes modernes. She taught for a few years while continuing to paint through WWII. 

    Marie Laurencin, Portrait of Coco Chanel, 1923
    Marie Laurencin, Portrait of Coco Chanel (Portrait de Mademoiselle Chanel), 1923

    As she got older, Marie isolated herself more and more due to her depression and declining health, but she continued to paint. She lived with her maid, Suzanne Moreau, who she lived with since 1925. They were rumored to be romantic, but at the least were very close. Marie adopted Suzanne at age 49 in order to make her the beneficiary of her estate. She died of a heart attack on June 6, 1956 and was buried in her beloved Paris. 

    Marie Laurencin, Ile de France
    Marie Laurencin, Ile de France, 1940
  • A Collage of Experience – The Work of Romare Bearden

    A Collage of Experience – The Work of Romare Bearden

    Romare Bearden was born on September 2, 1911 to (Richard) Howard and Bessye Bearden in Charlotte, North Carolina. In 1914, they moved north to Harlem, New York, joining millions of other African Americans in the Great Migration, looking for greater racial equality and more financial and educational opportunities. They lived there as the Harlem Renaissance ushered in a rebirth of African American culture and the arts. 

    Howard was a city sanitation inspector. He was also known to be quite the story teller and was a talented pianist. Bessye became a social and political activist and became the NY correspondent for the Chicago Defender, a regional African-American newspaper. She also became the first president of the Negro Women’s Democratic Association.

    Music and Stories

    The Beardens were a well-educated family and friends with some of the most prominent figures in Harlem at that time. They knew poet and writer Countee Cullen and musician Duke Ellington. They were also friends with actor, activist, and athlete Paul Robeson, founder-president of the National Council of Negro Women Mary McLeod Bethune, and the first African-American surgical intern at Harlem Hospital Dr. Aubré de Lambert Maynard. This gave young Romare exposure to some of the creative and intellectual minds of his time. 

    Duke Ellington
    Duke Ellington
    Countee Cullen
    Countee Cullen
    Mary McLeod Bethune
    Mary McLeod Bethune
    Paul Robeson
    Paul Robeson
    Aubre De Lambert Maynard
    Aubre De Lambert Maynard

    Romare spent his summers with his grandmother in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. She ran a boarding house for steel mill workers, many of whom were African American migrants from the South. The stories he heard them tell later became themes in some of his collages. 

    In the 1920s, the Beardens moved to Pittsburgh. When Romare graduated high school there, art wasn’t his passion yet. Instead he went to college for science and math. While in college, he played semi-pro baseball for the Boston Tigers in the Negro Leagues. 

    Education

    Romare’s higher education began at Lincoln University in Pennsylvania, where he studied science and math. His interest in art sparked when he discovered cartooning while attending Lincoln and soon aspired to be a cartoonist. 

    After a year he transferred to Boston University, where he was the director of the college humor magazine. While in Boston he took courses with artist George Grosz at the Arts Students League. Grosz was an asylum-seeker from Germany, whose art sharply criticized what he saw the decline of German society. Although he turned to painting more traditional themes in the United States, his influence helped Romare explore his own ways of depicting his experience as an African American through his art. 

    George Grosz Republican Automatons 1920
    Republican Automotons. George Grosz. 1920.

    Under Grosz’s tutelage Romare studied the Old Masters and explored Cubism, Futurism, Post-Impressionism, and Surrealism. During this time he also exhibited some of his early work at the Harlem YMCA and the Harlem Art Workshop. 

    A couple of years later, Romare transferred to New York University where he began to focus more on art. He became the lead cartoonist and editor for the student magazine and graduated in 1935. He continued to study under George Grosz for another two years, supporting himself as a political cartoonist for African American publications.

    The Exploration of Experience

    Romare Bearden Army
    Romare Bearden Army Photo

    Romare Bearden began as a painter, depicting religious themes in oil and watercolor. His first solo exhibition was in Harlem in 1940, but had to put his art career on hold in 1942 when he was drafted into the US Army. He served in World War II in the 372nd Infantry Regiment, a racially segregated unit, until 1945 when he was honorably discharged. 

    Factory Workers Romare Bearden 1942
    Factory Workers. Romare Bearden. 1942

    That same year he showed his series, The Passion of Christ, at the Samuel M. Kootz Gallery in New York City. The reception of his work was overwhelmingly positive. One of the images from that series, He is Arisen, was purchased by the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA). It was his first piece that was purchased by a museum and also his first piece put into a museum collection. 

    He is Arisen Romare Bearden 1945
    He is Arisen. Romare Bearden. MoMA. 1945.

    By 1950 Romare began to feel disillusioned and alienated by the systemic racism of American society. Using funds from the GI Bill, he to travelled to Paris and lived there for a couple of years. Romare met and befriended prominent creatives and intellectuals of the time, including Pablo Picasso and Jean-Paul Sartre. He also became a central figure in the black expat community in Paris. During that time he travelled Europe, studying art, literature, Buddhism, and philosophy. He explored techniques like Chinese painting and developed his collage process. It was around this time that his work also became more abstract, partly due to the influence of Picasso’s Cubist work. 

    When Romare returned the United States, he worked for the New York City Department of Social Services as a case worker. On nights and weekends, he continued to paint, developing his technique when he had the time. 

    How Abstract is Abstract Enough?

    In the 1950s, Romare was dropped by the Samuel M. Kootz gallery because his art wasn’t keeping with the trends of the time – it simply wasn’t abstract or modern enough by their standards.

    A Walk in Paradise Gardens Romare Bearden 1955
    A Walk in Paradise Gardens. Romare Bearden. 1955

    In 1954 Romare got a studio above the Apollo Theater. His style became more abstract and showed influences of his study of Chinese painting techniques. That same year he married dancer and choreographer Nanette Rohan.

    He later relocated the studio to downtown New York, but Harlem was still very much a part of his work and central to his life. Romare was a case worker by day and an artist on the side until 1969 when was was able to fully support himself and Nanette with his art.  He was able to open his own studio, started earning grants, and had time to work on commissions. 

    Through the Pages

    Romare Bearden’s rise as an artist began in the 1940s, but it was in the 1960s when he was really seen as a master collage artist. That was when he started focusing primarily on his collage work. He had been struggling with “expressing his experiences as a Black man and the obscurity of abstract painting.”

    The collages were made from cutting of popular magazines like Time (some of his work made the cover of magazines he tore pages from), African American magazines like Ebony and Jet, colored paper, and texture techniques with paint, graphite, and sandpaper. His work echoed the means of African American slave crafts, such as patchwork quilts, where they had to work with whatever materials were available to them. As one article describes his art, “Bearden crafted the African American experience in his works.”

    In the early 1960s Romare joined the Cordier & Ekstrom Gallery, where his work was exhibited for the rest of his life. He also showed his work through the United States and sometimes in Europe. 

    In 1963 he created the Projections series, comprised of  collage and photomontage techniques, photojournalism, and Pop Art. He depicted scenes of Pittsburgh and Harlem, but mostly Charlotte, North Carolina. 

    The Baptism Romare Bearden 1964
    The Baptism. Romare Bearden. 1964

    By the late 1960s Romare was a popular visiting professor at various universities. He also joined other artists to form the Cinque Gallery of New York. This was in direct protest to the 1969 exhibition Harlem on my Mind put on by the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The show did not allow black artists to exhibit and so Cinque was created to allow only black artists. 

    In 1973, Romare and Nanette made a second home in the Caribbean (St. Martin) where her ancestors were from. While there, he studied the culture and influence of Africans brought over through slave trade; themes that became apart of his work. His art also became more musical during this time, “from the urban blues of Kansas City and Harlem nightclubs, to the blues and church music of Mecklenburg, North Carolina.”

    Of the Blues Carolina Shout Romare Bearden 1974
    Of the Blues Carolina Shout. Romare Bearden. 1974

    Romare Could Do Anything

    Romare was a man of many talents. Although collage had become his primary medium, he continued to paint murals and series pieces for exhibitions. He “completed more than a dozen mural commissions in a variety of media including collage, ceramic tile, and faceted glass”. 

    He illustrated posters, wrote and illustrated books, and was a successful lyricist. Romare wrote songs for Billie Holiday and Dizzy Gillespie. He also helped out Nanette, occasionally designing programs, costumes, and sets for Alvin Ailey American Dance Company. 

    Social Activism and Legacy

    Throughout his career, no matter what he was working on, Romare made sure to give back. Whether it was commentary in his art, opening a gallery as a form of protest, or creating an organization to help minority emerging artists – Romare wanted to give his community as much opportunity as possible to succeed. These are just some of his accomplishments and awards: 

    1935 – Cofounded the Harlem Artists Guild

    1963 – Founded the Spiral Group with Charles Alston and Normal Lewis

    1964 – Became first art director of the Harlem Cultural Council

    1966 – Elected to the American Academy of Design and the National Institute of Arts and Letters

    1968 – Founding member of the Studio Museum in Harlem

    1969 – Cofounded the Cinque Gallery

    1970 – Received the Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship

    1978 – Awarded Frederick Douglas Medal by the New York Urban League

    1978 – Received the James Weldon Johnson Award from the NAACP

    1987 – Received the National Medal of Arts from President Ronald Reagan

    1990 – The Romare Bearden Foundation was established

    Romare Bearden died of bone cancer on March 12, 1988 in New York City. His ashes were scattered in St. Martin “as the French West Indies had been the subject of later works.”  They never had kids, but Romare left a lasting legacy as both an activist and a creator. 

    Conclusion

    There are a few things I need to address here. First, how the heck do you say his name?? I remember studying Romare Bearden back in high school (it’s been a minute) and we learned it as ro-MARE, two syllables, emphasis on the second syllable. According to his friend Albert Murray, it was actually pronounced RO-muh-re, three syllables, emphasis on the first. Murray also said Romare was named after a neighbor his mother liked.

    The second thing is that there is far more information here than I can provide. Please explore the resources linked here. There are so many resources and so much to learn about Romare and the world he grew up in. 

    Finally, I don’t feel I did Romare Bearden’s work the justice it deserves with this article. I want to leave a couple of quotes here from my sources that have the words I didn’t seem to this month. 

    “One of Bearden’s works that best captures this amalgam of styles is titled The Block. It depicts a Harlem street, with row-house buildings and the bustling life of the neighborhood. At first glance, it’s a cacophony of shapes and images. But as the scene settles in, the faces of people catch the eye. Composed of two or more fragments of photos, they begin to reveal a lifetime of experiences.”

    romare bearden the block 1971
    The Block. Romare Bearden. 1971

    “His works’ complexity lies in their poetic abstraction, in which layered fragments of colour and pattern evoke the rhythms, textures, and mysteries of a people’s experience”

    Thank you for reading! Don’t forget to check out our other Artists of the Month!

    Sources:

    https://beardenfoundation.org/

    https://www.nga.gov/collection/artist-info.6845.html

    https://www.theartstory.org/artist/bearden-romare/

    https://www.biography.com/artist/romare-bearden

    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Romare-Bearden

    https://www.purchase.edu/live/files/3329-project-lets-create-a-collage

    https://mymodernmet.com/romare-bearden/

  • September Artist of the Month – Romare Beardon

    September Artist of the Month – Romare Beardon

    Romare Beardon was an artist that could do anything. He drew cartoons, painted, collaged, designed costumes, wrote songs, and authored books. Beardon used his art to challenge the idea that black artists should only create art rooted in their own culture. He explored ways to depict the daily lives of African Americans in the rural south and urban north through modern art; all while expressing the changing landscape of civil rights and social norms. 

    Romare Beardon had a prolific career and led an impactful life. We’re going to have a lot to talk about!

    romare beardon with painting
  • Art for KjARTan’s Sake?

    Art for KjARTan’s Sake?

    Sorry for the cringy title. I put it down as a placeholder figuring I’d come up with something better by the time I got done writing this. You know what else was hard? Coming up with a project for Kjartan Slettemark! He was edgy and political. As much as I admire his work, political is not something I do here. I want my community to be a safe place to chat, to be silly, to talk about a good/bad/boring/exciting day without any judgement. 

    On top of that, Kjartan loved his plastic and how do you digitize that? Looking back at Nixon Visions, I could have taken his image and processed it in a bunch of different ways, but in the end it was something else that spoke to me. The Poodle costume. 

    kjartan slettemark poodle costume

    I love everything about this thing. The best part is that it all came about because of a typo. Six months of work to prove a point against system that dogged the man for years over his mental health all because they couldn’t spell. So good!

    Then I came across this image: 

    kjartan slettemark marilyn pose

    That’s when I knew I needed to paint a sexy KjARTan poodle and that’s exactly what happened. One layer, black and white, done in one sitting. 

    kjartan slettemark sexy poodle painting

    It was so much fun to paint! A little dark, a little weird – it’s the kind of art I love to make. So there you have it, my little homage to Kjartan Slettemark!

  • Of Passports and Performance Art – The Work of Kjartan Slettemark

    Of Passports and Performance Art – The Work of Kjartan Slettemark

    The first thing I noticed when researching the life of Kjartan Slettemark is that there aren’t many sources to reference. He was such an interesting artist – how can this be?? We’ll dive as deep as we can in this post, but it’s worth checking out the sources and seeing what else there is. If there’s one thing authors can agree on, it’s that Kjartan lived and breathed his art! 

    Kjartan’s Early Life

    Born in August 6, 1932 in Naustdal, Norway, Kjartan Slettemark was the youngest of four siblings. He pursued a formal arts education, eventually teaching for a time, but he found that Academia didn’t suit him and moved to Sweden in the mid-1960s. 

    kjartan slettemark portrait

    Playing with Plastic

    The 1960s marked the rise of plastic. As a material in the daily life of the average person it replaced more expensive materials. For the art world, it was a new medium to explore. In 1964, Kjartan took a course on in plastics engineering. He made many pieces from plastic, including a cake, eggs, and masks. He even cast his own form in plastic and was wrapped in plastic wrap. 

    kjartan slettemark plastic collage

    Tool for a Hero, Vacuum-packed Collage. 1991.

    One of his most famous (and controversial) pieces was a collage made from plastic that protested the Vietnam war. 

    VIETNAM

    In 1965 Norway, Kjartan burst into public view with plastic, politics, and controversy. As part of a project titled “Image of the City”, he created a plastic collage. The composition was an open mouth – inside were the letters VIETNAM, a tiny American flag, and a small figure representing an injured child. With it he included the text, “From a report from Vietnam: Children are showered with burning napalm, their skin is burned into black wounds and they die.” The work was based on a newspaper report that detailed how children were burned to death with napalm.

    kjartan slettemark vietnam plastic collage

    On Reports from Vietnam, 1965.

    The collage was put on display (along with other artists’ works) in front of the Storting, the Parliament of Norway, in Oslo. It was vandalized at least three times by different people, but it wasn’t taken down. The art remained in its display case for the rest of the show with police protection to prevent further vandalism. 

    More importantly, the attention garnered by the Vietnam collage got people talking about US involvement in the war and debating art as a platform for protest. Some authors highlight how intense the public reaction was to the piece, but it did was good art does – it started the discussion and brought out peoples’ raw feelings. The Vietnam war was already controversial and polarizing. The art gave the public a target for their stance on the issue and a platform to express how they felt. 

    On Sweden and Being “Borderline”

    Kjartan became a Swedish citizen in 1966 after living in Stockholm for 6 years. He was an art teacher for a while, but was fired for refusing to give the students grades (he gave them colorful drawings instead!). As a result, he had to file for social services in 1964. Four years later, he showed up at a social services meeting in an “eccentric outfit” with red and green caps on his teeth. The agency questioned whether Slettemark was simply unemployed or mentally ill. He told them he was an artist that was diagnosed as “borderline” and was prescribed anti-psychotic medication. They tried to commit him, but he refused. 

    Kjartan’s battles with social services over his mental health was a situation he often explored in his art. He dove into what it meant to be “borderline” and what it meant to be “somewhere between healthy and sick, normal and deviant.” 

    In 1969, Kjartan put his medication and other items on display in an art show that showcased his mental health struggles. He printed the invitations for the show on welfare application forms. But what truly made this a Kjartan event was that he sent the bill for whole show to social services. 

    News coverage of the show brought enough public attention to finally bring the situation with social services to an end. 

    The Passport

    Kjartan was staunchly opposed to Richard Nixon and the war on Vietnam. However, after Nixon resigned, Kjartan claimed to feel some sort of connection to him. Kjartan just happened to need to renew his passport, so he took an image of Nixon taken from a 1971 campaign poster and put his own hair and beard on Nixon’s face. He capitalized is name as KjARTan to “sign” the art and submitted it with his passport renewal. The application was processed without incident. He used the passport to travel Europe and to and from the United States several times and was never stopped. 

    kjartan slettemark nixon passport

    Nixon Visions

    Around the same time as the passport, “Nixon Visions” was born from the same Nixon campaign image. Kjartan turned the image into a coffee advertisement and processed the image over and over again throughout the years. One version shows blood running from Nixon’s mouth and cup while another depicts him with a Hitler mustache. Some iterations deconstruct the image, such as one where the eyes are cut out in triangles, switched, and flipped upside down. Another removes the face completely and replace the coffee cup with pieces of the face. 

    nixon visions kjartan slettemark

    Performance ART

    In 1976, Kjartan created his infamous poodle costume. He had once again been summoned by social services, but they mistakenly told him to report to hundmottagningen, which translates to “dog reception”, instead of kundmottagningen, “customer reception”. He spent six months creating the costume, which included built in jackpot sounds and a fluffy codpiece. 

    At one point Kjartan made passports for his own country of Kjartanistan, producing about 500 of them for anyone that wanted to be a citizen. It was a “non-territorial state with planet Earth as capital city, and himself as prime minister.”

    In 2003, he donned a Marilyn Monroe wig and created a Warhol-style collage series titled “Self-Portrait with Marilyn”. He had to give a speech after receiving an award from the Academy of Fine Arts in Stockholm and asked if he could wear the wig, to which they said “Of course!” 

    Conclusion

    This is just a small capture of Kjartan Slettemark’s work. The Poodle was only one of many costumes he wore to blur the lines between life, art, and public discourse. Later in his career he explored his view of the world through video. Nixon Visions continued well into the 2000s. Kjartan was an active artist to the end, stirring the pot until he died on December 13, 2008 of heart failure. 

    I wasn’t kidding when I said information about KjARTan was sparse. There are some sources that provide additional details about his life, but I don’t include information that I can’t cross-reference with something else. My sources always have more than what I include in my posts, so please give them a click if you want to learn more. And don’t forget about the other artists we’ve covered this year! Thank you for reading!

    Sources:

    https://nbl.snl.no/Kjartan_Slettemark

    https://www.artland.com/artists/kjartan-slettemark

    https://archive.ph/20130914133629/http://www.dagsavisen.no/kultur/stasminister-puddel-og-marilyn/

    https://www.nasjonalmuseet.no/en/collection/object/MS-02788-1988

    https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/33/bigert.php

    https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004310506/B9789004310506-s064.xml

    https://liljevalchs.se/en/om-oss/aktuellt/timeline/kjartan-slettemark-pudeln/

    https://milenaolesinska77.medium.com/kjartan-slettemark-self-portrait-with-marilyn-7ec730d9c86c

  • Innovation and Controversy – August Artist of the Month

    Innovation and Controversy – August Artist of the Month

    Kjartan Slettemark was a name I’d never heard until a month ago when I was asked if I would cover a Nordic artist. As soon as I began reading about him I wanted to know more and he’s now our August Artist of the Month! 

    Information about him is a little light, but he was prolific and controversial. We’ll be talking about plastics, Nixon, ID fraud, wigs, Vietnam, poodle costumes, and drug smuggling – all in the name of freedom of expression. This month’s blog may have to take a slightly different format, but it’s going to be a wild ride!

    See you there!

    kjartan slettemark artist of the month

    In the meantime, check out some of the previous artists of the month or see some art in action!

  • A Woman’s Perspective in Baroque Art

    A Woman’s Perspective in Baroque Art

    (Artemisia Gentileschi, Part II)

    What is Baroque Art

    For the last two months I’ve been talking about Baroque art this and Baroque art that, but what is it really? This little blurb sums it up better than I could in an entire blog post: 

    “The Baroque artists were particularly focused on natural forms, spaces, colors, lights, and the relationship between the observer and the literary or portrait subject in order to produce a strong, if muted, emotional experience.”

    (https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Baroque_art)

    Essentially we’re looking at drama. We’re looking at using tension in the forms and lighting to draw the viewer into the scene being depicted. Different regions had their own spins on the concept. Last month I wrote about Peter Paul Rubens, another Baroque artist from Antwerp. If you put his work side by side with Artemisia Gentileschi’s you’ll see that they had very different technical approaches to their subjects, but both fall into the definition of Baroque art. 

    rubens judith and her maidservant
    Peter Paul Rubens. Judith with the Head of Holofernes. ca. 1616
    gentileschi judith and her maidservant
    Artemisia Gentileschi. Judith and her Maidservant. ca. 1623.

    OH the DRAMA… er… Contrast

    Ever since I learned the terms chiaroscuro and tenebrism, I’ve used them interchangeably. I think I was even taught that they were the same thing. In researching this post I learned that they in fact are not the same thing – similar, but different. What I’ve noticed is that chiaroscuro tends to be used more when talking about Italian artists, probably because it’s an Italian word, and tenebrism tends to be used more elsewhere. That or my brain is messing with me because I’ve been doing it wrong for a loooong time…

    So what’s the difference? 

    Chiaroscuro literally comes from the Italian words for light and dark. When you see a brightly lit subject against a dark background, that’s chiaroscuro. Tenebrism is a type of chiaroscuro. This article describes the difference as being in the shadows. Tenebrism takes the dark areas to full black and creates a sort of spotlight effect. The article goes further: 

    “If chiaroscuro is about the relationship between light and shadow, then tenebrism is about the shadow itself.”

    Beautifully said. Chiaroscuro is a core element of Italian Baroque art and mastering it is a sure-fire way to get more depth and drama into your art. Personally I fall way too hard into tenebrism when I shade, but I’m doing better! I swear!

    Where’s the Art??

    Let’s look at some paintings! We’re going to explore Artemisia Gentileschi’s work by comparing it to her contemporaries. Her treatment of various popular subjects was very different than that of her male counterparts. You will often find art historians comparing her pieces to those of Caravaggio – perhaps one of her greatest influences after her father.

    Even without these comparisons, her art still stands out. She had a perspective that no other artist of her time could have and the level of her craftsmanship rivaled that of her peers. With that, let’s dive into her first known painting – Susanna and the Elders.

    Susanna and the Elders, 1610

    The Susanna and the Elders story is from chapter 13 of the book of Daniel. She was the beautiful wife of Jo’akim, a wealthy man from Babylon. He was the most honored in his community and frequently entertained visitors. This included two elders that were recently appointed as judges. 

    Every day at noon, when everyone had left, Susanna would walk the gardens outside her home. On a particularly hot day, she wanted to bathe in the garden, sending her two maids to fetch her oil and ointments and ordering them to shut the door behind them. 

    They didn’t see the two elders hiding. The men had grown to lust after Susanna and were lying in wait for the chance to seduce her. As soon as she was alone, they ran to her and professed their “love”. They told her that if she did not lay with them, they would tell everyone that she sent her maids away so she could lay with another man.

    gentileschi baroque susanna and the elders
    Artemisia Gentileschi. Susanna and the Elders. 1610

    This is the moment captured here: the two elders leering over the young woman as she resists their advances. Artemisia depicts her twisting away from them, a look of fear and distress on her face as they conspire behind her. The figures of the two men form a single heavy presence hanging above Susanna, making them all the more threatening and oppressive. The three figures form an inverted pyramid, expressing the power they hold over their victim in that moment. 

    The men are dark and shadowy, while light shines upon Susanna. Not only does this illustrate their ill intentions against her, it highlights Susanna as a virtuous woman who did not give to them. I also believe the light on Susanna foreshadows the favor she received from God later in the story. Despite being arrested as a result of the elders’ false accusations and sentenced to death, her prayers for salvation were answered when Daniel proved her innocence. 

    Cagnacci vs. Gentileschi

    Now let’s compare it to Guido Cagnacci’s version. He was another Baroque painter that lived right around the same time as Artemisia Gentileschi. 

    guido cagnacci susanna and the elders baroque
    Guido Cagnacci. Susanna and the Elders. ca. Second Half of 17th Century
    gentileschi baroque susanna and the elders
    Artemisia Gentileschi. Susanna and the Elders. 1610

    In Cagnacci’s version, Susanna is on the same level as the Elders. She leans slightly away from them slightly, but her face is calm and she’s making eye contact. This is hardly the reaction a woman would have when being interrupted by two old men in the middle of her bath. We see the same shadowy figures contrasting against the light on Susanna, but the composition and her pose suggest she is the one seducing them. Any indication of her virtue, such as her crossed legs, seems like an afterthought. Her presence and her beauty appear to be more for the consumption of the viewer than a realistic portrayal of Susanna’s plight. 

    If you look at other versions of this scene, you’ll see varying degrees of resistance (or lack thereof) from Susanna. You’ll also see varying degrees of menace from the elders. In a few paintings they even look kind of… nice.

    Sources: 

    https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/susanna-apocrypha

    https://medium.com/thinksheet/how-to-read-paintings-susanna-and-the-elders-by-artemisia-gentileschi-28098c776476

    https://www.artemisiagentileschi.org/susanna-and-the-elders/

    Judith Slaying Holofernes, ca. 1614

    If there was one thing Artemisia Gentileschi could do it was to capture a moment. Not just any moment, but one of raw emotion and tension. In Judith Beheading Holofernes, she captured every ounce of anger and vengeance when she portrayed Judith sawing off the head General Holofernes. 

    The story goes that Holofernes was an Assyrian General sent by the king to besiege the city of Bethulia where the beautiful widow Judith lived. She prayed to God and decided to kill the General herself. Judith put on her finest clothes and went to the enemy camp with her maidservant. She seduced the General and got him drunk. Once he passed out, she cut off his head with his own sword. 

    gentileschi judith slaying holofernes baroque painting
    Artemisia Gentileschi. Judith Slaying Holofernes. ca. 1614

    The scene is brutal. The maidservant holds down Holofernes as Judith grips him by the hair and saws into his neck. Blood drips down the bed. The women wear expressions of anger and determination while the general’s face is frozen in fear and panic. 

    This composition is lit by a single light source outside of the scene, the lights and darks adding even more tension and drama to the act itself. The pure darkness of the background adds an element of the unknown and contains the focus of the viewer to that of the women – to kill the general. 

    Now I really didn’t want to do this because everyone does it, but it’s such a good comparison that we pretty much have to look at Artemisia’s version next to Caravaggio’s. After all, he is one of the best known Baroque painters. This really takes me back to the good ol’ college days looking at slides of this exact thing…

    Caravaggio vs. Gentileschi

    caravaggio baroque painting judith beheading holofernes
    Caravaggio. Judith Beheading Holofernes. ca. 1599
    gentileschi judith slaying holofernes baroque painting
    Artemisia Gentileschi. Judith Slaying Holofernes. ca. 1614

    In Caravaggio’s version we have the same beautiful chiaroscuro, a great moment of tension, and a gruesome portrayal of Holofernes’ death. What’s different is Judith. Sure, she has a handful of hair to hold the General’s head while she cuts it off and the tension in her hand as she grips the sword is beautifully rendered. But look at how far back she’s standing and the uncertainty in her expression. This is not the look of a woman that’s there to murder someone in the night. 

    The maidservant is elderly and looks on as she hold the bag to carry the General’s head – a far cry from Artemisia’s version where the maidservant is actively involved. It’s almost as if the artists are expressing two different views on what a woman is capable of. In these moments it can be hard not to place a modern feminist perspective on viewpoints from centuries ago, but it’s just as difficult to deny that Artemisia had something to say about what women can do. 

    Sources: 

    https://smarthistory.org/gentileschi-judith-slaying-holofernes/

    https://www.hypercritic.org/experience/art/artemisia-gentileschi-judith-beheading-holofernes-stories-of-women-and-revenge-1620/

    https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-judith-beheading-holofernes-art-historys-favorite-icon-female-rage

    Judith and Her Maidservant, ca. 1623

    This is one of my all-time favorite paintings. I love everything about a single light source painting and anyone that’s been in one of my streams and witnessed my struggle with making things way too dark totally gets why I love this piece. This is what tenebrism is all about.

    We’re at the next part of the Judith and Holofernes story where Judith and her maidservant are about to escape the camp and return to Bethulia. They have the bag full of severed head and are peering into the darkness, presumably to see if anyone is coming. Judith still holds the sword she used to kill Holofernes while her maidservant secures the head. 

    gentileschi judith and her maidservant
    Artemisia Gentileschi. Judith and her Maidservant. ca. 1623.

    This is an example of a composition using tenebrism rather than chiaroscuro. The blackness that surrounds them alludes to the unknown and the potential danger as they complete their missions. Strangely they have no blood on their clothes, but this is true for all of the depictions of this tale at the time. Perhaps it was an aesthetic choice or some sense of propriety (weird since we’re talking about two women that just cut a guy’s head off), but maybe the red drapery here is an allusion to the bloodshed. 

    Gentileschi vs. Gentileschi

    But what about her father’s version? How does Orazio’s Judith compare? 

    orazio gentileschi judith and her maidservant
    Orazio Gentileschi. Judith and Her Maidservant with the Head of Holofernes. ca. 1621
    gentileschi judith and her maidservant
    Artemisia Gentileschi. Judith and her Maidservant. ca. 1623.

    Orazio’s version seems to show more confusion than determination in the expressions of the women. The way they huddle suggests fear. In Artemisia’s Judith, one is on the lookout while the other secures the head. She also added more tension with her single light source where Orazio’s composition includes ambient light that fully illuminates the figures. They still don’t have blood on their clothes, but in this one Judith is wearing red. Maybe it represents the blood and aggression here too?

    Finally, Orazio’s composition has the women forming a pyramid. There’s no space to breathe between them and maybe he chose to do that to create that moment of tension. But Artemisia chose to split them up, with one standing  and one crouching. This creates a more dynamic interaction between the figures, the scene, and the viewer.

    Sources: 

    https://www.artemisiagentileschi.org/judith-and-her-maidservant/

    https://www.sartle.com/artwork/judith-and-maidservant-with-head-of-holofernes-artemisia-gentileschi

    Conclusion

    Phew! This was a long one, wasn’t it? Thanks for going on this journey with me. Artemisia Gentileschi truly is one of my favorite artists! I could have gone on for longer, but I want to know what you think. How do you interpret these paintings? What other differences do you see? 

    Most of all, I want to know what artist you want to see next! Let me know in the comments below or holler at me on Twitter

    If it ain’t Baroque, don’t fix it. Hehe, I had to.

  • Artemisia Gentileschi, Part I

    Artemisia Gentileschi, Part I

    Female Strength in the Baroque Period

    Early Life

    Artemisia Gentileschi was born in Rome on July 8, 1593 to Prudentia Montoni and Orazio Gentileschi. Her father was a painter that was friends with and closely followed Caravaggio**. Despite his attempts to put Artemisia in a nunnery (it was exceedingly rare for a non-aristocratic woman to become an artist), she still ended up in his studio. This gave her all the tools she needed to develop as an artist. She was tutored by Orazio’s colleague Agostino Tassi and worked as their apprentice on some of their larger commissions. 

    portrait of orazio gentileschi
    caravaggio portrait

    Orazio and Caravaggio – Partners in Crime!

    Tragic Notoriety

    Artemisia’s life was not an easy ride on her father’s coattails into becoming an artist in her own right. He himself even commented that her skill rivaled his own when she was a teenager. She worked hard to perfect her craft, which may have drawn the ire of her tutor, Tassi. Some have speculated that he was jealous of her skill. 

    One day in the studio he repeatedly ordered her to stop working – a command she tried to refuse. He then forced her down, placed a handkerchief over her mouth to keep her quiet, and raped her. In an attempt to salvage her her honor and reputation, Artemisia began a relationship with her rapist, thinking he would marry her. In the end, he refused. 

    As if that wasn’t traumatic and humiliating enough, Orazio decided to press charges against Tassi. This lead to a very public trial where Artemisia not only had to recount the rape in detail, but she was subjected to thumbscrews to determine her honesty. Because the entire trial hinged on the loss of her virginity, she also had to undergo a gynecological examination. After months of being thoroughly re-traumatized, Artemisia was able to convince the court that Tassi took her virginity and it ruled in her favor. 

    Tassi was sentenced to prison, although some accounts say he was exiled from Rome. Either way, he never served his sentence.

    Florence

    Since Artemisia’s virtue was (legally) restored, her father arranged for her to marry soon after the trial. The groom was a painter from Florence named Pietro Antonio di Vicenzo Stiatessi. She relocated to Florence with him, leaving the drama and spectacle behind. They had one daughter, Prudentia***, named after Artemisia’s mother who passed away when she was 12. 

    The marriage was convenient, but there was no love. If anything it gave Artemisia the freedom to pursue her art. While in Florence she gained the patronage of Cosimo II de Medici, cousin of Marie de Medici (remember her??). He was an ardent supporter of education and gave full support to Galileo. Artemisia also became friends with many artists and intellects – including the famous astronomer. 

    cosimo II de medici

    Cosimo II de Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany

    This access to the powerful and the affluent also broadened her own knowledge. She learned to read and write as well as courtly etiquette. The connections she fostered with her patrons not only allowed her to continually grow as an artist, but to gain an education most women could not access. 

    Artemisia was the first woman to be admitted into the Accademia del Disegno – a sort of guild for working artists. The likes of Michelangelo and Bronzino were members of the organization, but membership meant for more to Artemisia than honor and prestige. Women were not allowed to do many things during her time – simple things like making a purchase. Her association with the Accademia del Disegno allowed her to buy her own art supplies, travel alone, and sign contracts. 

    self portrait as st catherine artemisia gentileschi

    Self Portrait as St. Catherine of Alexandria, 1619

    Later Life

    In 1621, Artemisia left her husband. She returned to Rome where her career continued to grow and she enjoyed a healthy patronage from many elite clients. After a few years she moved to Venice and in 1630 she settled in Naples. In 1638 she was invited to the court of Charles I of England where her father had been working for over a decade. She may have gone there to help him finish a large commission as he was 74 at the time. He died the following year. 

    Artemisia stayed in London for a short time after her father’s death before returning to Naples. She spent the rest of her life there, continuing to paint. Documentation from this part of her life is sparse and her date of death is unclear. Some place it as early as 1652, but some of her later work is dated after that. What we do know is that she died in Naples, where the plague struck in 1656. It can’t be proven, but many believe she died of the plague that year along with many other great artists. 

    **At one point Orazio and Caravaggio were charged for graffiti in Rome They wrote some not-to-nice things about another artist and even went to trial!

    ***Some articles say Artemisia had two daughters. Wiki says she had five kids and Prudentia is the only one that survived into adulthood. The only thing that any of them agree on is that Prudentia (also known as Palmira) grew up to be a painter like her mom. 

    Part II

    Sources: 

    https://www.biography.com/artist/artemisia-gentileschi

    https://www.artemisiagentileschi.org/biography/

    https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-baroque-master-artemisia-gentileschi

    https://www.theartstory.org/artist/gentileschi-artemisia/

  • July Artist of the Month

    July Artist of the Month

    I’ve been waiting for this one all year! She is one of my favorite artists EVER. I even wrote my senior thesis on her. Her dad was friends with Caravaggio and she was the center of a rape trial that treated her as property. Sadly these things sometimes overshadow her artistic career. We’ll talk about it, but I want to focus on her ART and all the reasons it was better than her contemporaries. Are you ready? 

    [I totally tried to insert a fun gif here, but my site was being a jerk, so just imagine a little fanfare here.]

    I’m talking about Artemisia Gentileschi! She was an Italian painter from the 17th century and a master of color and light. She painted strong female figures in a time when women were often portrayed as fragile and vulnerable. 

    Self-Portrait as the Allegory of Painting. 1638.

    We have to tread carefully here though. A woman’s role in society at the time was very different than what it is now and we can’t go applying modern feminist principles to what was going on in Artemisia’s life. Still, we can absolutely appreciate the way she represented female figures from biblical stories and we will be comparing her versions to those of her male counterparts. 

    You’ll see a lot of contrast and single light source compositions in her work and guess what! That’s going to be our project for this month. We’ll focus on tenebrism (the use of light and dark) and how it impacts a composition. 

    My son once asked me if I could meet any artist, dead or alive, who would it be? It would have to be Artemisia Gentileschi. 

  • Digitizing a Master’s Technique

    Digitizing a Master’s Technique

    Technique is something we haven’t talked about enough for Artist of the Month. Lucky for us, Peter Paul Rubens is a *fabulous* master to study when it comes to materials and application in painting! The man was able to finish a masterpiece in a matter of hours thanks to the media and techniques he used. So how did he do it? 

    Influence of a Master

    Rubens was heavily influenced by Titian, a talented and prolific Italian painter from the 16th century (that’s really an understatement). The two artists just missed each other by a couple of decades, as Titian died in 1576, the year before Rubens was born. Still, Rubens was able to enjoy Titian’s work in travels to Italy and copied the master’s work well into his own career. In total he painted 21 Titians!

    venus urbino titian

    Venus of Urbino. Titian. 1538.

    Although Rubens studied the master in depth, they worked in different ways. Titian started with a complete composition painted in grayscale called a grisaille as an underpainting. Then he would add color and depth with transparent glazes. Rubens wanted to create the same effect, but with an all prima technique. This literally means “at first attempt” and refers to wet in wet painting. Think Bob Ross painting happy little trees and making sure every bush had a friend – that’s alla prima.

    Tools of the Trade

    There are few things Rubens did to speed up his process. First, he almost always started with a finished drawing. This meant he didn’t have to worry about the composition while he painted – he was able to focus completely on his technique. 

    The next key to his craft was the medium he used in his paint. Described as a “thick jelly”, it consisted of 10 parts each linseed oil, turpentine, and mastic tears, and one part litharge (or powdered white lead pigment or white lead paste). Talking about the properties of these materials is for another post (let me know if you want to jump down the rabbit hole!), but this medium gave Rubens the ability to apply both transparent and translucent layers while retaining the texture of the brushstroke. It gave him the flexibility to scumble in colors or blend them seamlessly. 

    The medium was also a bit of a double-edged sword. It would start to dry after a few hours, making it unworkable. So Rubens was able to work a piece quickly, but it was partly because he had to. 

    Can the Technique Be Digitized? 

    For our project this month I decided to follow the same steps Rubens did to make a painting. Since Rubens’ first step was to start with a finished drawing, I grabbed a sketch I did from some unknown length of time ago and created a color palette based on colors he actually used (more on that next post). 

    rubens color palette technique

    These are some of the colors Rubens used.

    The Base

    He would start on a light umber background, so I took the umber and lightened up about halfway for my base. Next he would sketch his composition on top of that with a wash of darker brown, using it to map out the shadows and line the lighter areas. I copy pasta’d my sketch onto my base, locked the pixels, and colored it in with Van Dyck brown. It’s a little cheatsy, but I figured it was about the same thing. 

    The problem with this is that the sketch was done with a pencil brush, so I was starting with a rough base. As I continued with the painting, I found myself constantly fighting that roughness and making sure it was all blended in. Maybe throwing a blur over it before painting would have helped, but hey – hindsight. 

    rubens technique digital

    Next he took a medium brown tone to lay in the lighter areas, typically where the skin tones would go. I lightened up the Van Dyck brown a bit and filled in the skin areas. It really did make a beautiful base there – something I’ll try again in the future. 

    rubens technique base

    Adding Color

    Color be added next. Red for lips and cheeks, blues for… blue stuff. Honestly I derped a little bit on this part. I looked at my piece and thought, there’s not that much color… For some reason my brain didn’t register that the car and the hair needed color. I added a touch of cochineal lake red to the lips and it mixed with the base into a beautiful soft pink. Then I put some indigo in the eyes and they looked totally creepy. So I tried lazurite blue, but it didn’t help much. I never was able to paint all the creep out of those eyes, but thankfully a good highlight can help. 

    rubens technique color

    Creating Depth

    Graytones came next. This is how Rubens built up light and shadow – with various tones of plain old gray that he mixed himself. I wanted the denim jacket to be gray, so I skipped the color and went right in with gray. Against the warm background it gave it a bluish appearance. Then I went in and defined the darker areas and modeled the lighter areas. 

    At this point I started to wonder if I should be using separate layers for this. The grays didn’t always mix nicely into the dark browns and it got frustrating at times. It also wasn’t always the smoothest blend, which shows in the finished piece. There are areas in the jacket where the warmth peeking through is kind of nice. I feel like there are times where doing that on purpose could be useful, but making it look intentional might require an extra layer or two. That being said, if it’s all prima, we should be going all in on one layer, right?

    rubens technique graytones

    Adding More Color!

    After the gray, Rubens would have added stronger colors to add more depth. The color forced the gray back, while the gray pushed the color forward. 

    At this point I added color to the car. I went with a mix of reds and browns. My attempt at chrome trim was a little half-hearted, but a little more time would have gotten it there. I also added color to the hair. I don’t think I did enough with the gray tones because I didn’t get the depth I really wanted. Again, using additional layers probably would have fixed this and I wondered if I should redo the whole thing. 

    rubens technique color

    With all the color and depth, Rubens would have added transparent layers of reds and grays to the shadows to create bounce highlights. I missed this step. Oops. Then it was time to add the darkest shadows with translucent darks and brightest highlights with opaque light color. I went back in and darkened up the deepest parts and popped in those highlights. Overall the piece looked instantly better. I’m not at all biased because contrast is my favorite thing ever. Nope, not at all. 

    Did I Replicate the Technique?

    Rubens’ work didn’t come together until the end and I found that to be the case with my painting too. It was those final applications of value and color that made it cohesive. Did I nail his process digitally? Definitely not. But I think I could with another try. It took a round of trying it all out to see how it really works. I’m not mad about the way my painting turned out and I have a few more tricks up my sleeve for future work. 

    Trying out the techniques of the old masters is 100% worth trying out whether you work traditionally or digitally. I got my information from the book “How to Paint Like the Old Masters” by Joseph Sheppard. He talks about many other famous painters and their materials and techniques. Check it out if you’re interested in seeing how some the most famous artistic minds worked!

    If you want to see me work on these projects in real time, I stream it on Twitch and YouTube. I’d love to share the experience with you! 

    Thanks for reading!