Category: projects

  • My February Expressionism Project!

    My February Expressionism Project!

    My Expressionism project for this month was a cute little (digital) painting of two birds. I did the birds, sky, and mountains on separate layers so I could export all of the combinations of primary colors and see how it changed the feeling of the painting. Let’s take a look!

    The piece was initially done with yellow birds, blue sky, and red mountains. According to one of the biggest Expressionism artists Franz Marc, yellow represents feminine happy qualities, blue is masculine and spiritual, and red is physical and sometimes violent. 

    With these things in mind, the yellow birds may be seen as hopeful and free in their flight together. In this moment they don’t need to worry about the dangers of the world that exist far below them.

    yellow birds blue sky red mountains expressionist expressionism digital art

    Next I switched the colors of the sky and the mountains. It immediately takes on a more ominous tone (red kind of does that anyway thought, doesn’t it?). Now the birds are more in conflict with their surroundings, if not in outright danger. Personally, I’ve always found red and yellow next to each other (and/or as the main colors) to be very uncomfortable. There is definitely more tension in this combination of colors.

    yellow birds red sky blue mountains expressionist expressionism digital art

    Swapping the color of the birds and mountains give the ominous red a different spin. There seems to be more tension between the birds. Perhaps they are no longer on the same side?

    blue birds red sky yellow mountains expressionism expressionist digital art

    Something about making the sky yellow didn’t add joy or femininity for me. I think it’s because it’s a darker yellow. That’s pretty much what happens when you change the color of a layer (especially to a lighter color) instead of repainting it. Even if the yellow were brighter, I don’t think my feelings on it would change much since I am more than a little biased against yellow hues (don’t get me started). All that aside, something about the background makes me feel like these birds are fighting for scarce resources, however perhaps not against each other.

    blue birds yellow sky red mountains expressionism expressionist digital art

    I feel like making the birds red instantly puts them in conflict with each other against that yellow sky. The blue mountains remove the element of scarcity and danger below them, but again, I don’t feel like that’s a happy yellow space around them. At this point they are in a fight over something more personal.

    red birds yellow sky blue mountains digital art expressionist expressionism

    Finally we have the red birds on a blue sky with yellow mountains. There is still tension between the birds, but not necessarily conflict. The blue sky creates a space of familiarity and peace. Following Franz’s theory of yellow as joyous and hopeful, the mountains would represent good tidings to come. But we know by now that it’s not working that way for me… it looks more like desert to me, perhaps adding urgency to the flight of the birds.

    red birds blue sky yellow mountains digital art expressionism expressionist

    This little Expressionism experiment was a fun way to play with color and be able to experience how changing it can alter the outcome of the piece. While I can objectively apply another artist’s (Marc’s) color theory to my own work, in the end it doesn’t change the way I feel about each iteration. There are mainstream interpretations of each color and my own feelings conflict with some of them.

    I think we all have our own personal color theories with our divergences from what most people see. That’s part of what makes viewing and discussing art so interesting. I’m sure you see things differently (maybe very differently) from how I interpreted all the birds. So tell me – what’s your personal color theory? How do the colors change the birds for you?

  • Impressionist Art – Did I Do It?

    Impressionist Art – Did I Do It?

    When I started my little digital Impressionist painting, I made sure to go in with no expectations. If it came out great – great! If it came out bad – also great! The whole point was to try it out and hopefully learn something along the way. 

    It was definitely a rough start at first, but by the end I found a sort of rhythm. Somehow this blobbly colorful thing I was making started to look like something and I’m really happy with the result! Could there be improvements? Absolutely. Did I approach it the way an Impressionist would? I’m still not really sure about that. 

    However! I feel like a better artist having done this. I had to work against what I normally do (Blend, blend, blend! Make it darker!) and I think I really started to see my subject. When it was done, I didn’t really care that it’s a little off. I captured not only a moment, but all the things I felt about that moment in the movement and energy of the (digital) paint. 

    So who did I pick to paint? Chewy and my son! It wasn’t my original idea, but on the day I was thinking about the picture I took of my son laying with the dog on the couch. It’s one of my favorite moments and even though it was a few years ago, they still hang out like that to this day. As my aunt said when she saw the picture, “There’s nothing like a boy and his dog.” 

    And so without further ado, here’s my little Impressionist experiment: A Boy and His Dog

    Boy and His Dog digital impressionist style painting

    My one regret with this is that I forgot to turn on the time lapse recording. It would have been such a cool playback! At least there’s still the stream. You can watch it here. 

    Thanks for reading! I’ll see you in February for the next Artist of the Month!

  • January Artist of the Month: Berthe Morisot

    January Artist of the Month: Berthe Morisot

    When I decided to do the Artist of the Month project, Berthe Morisot was one of the first artists I thought of. Her talents as an artist could have easily been tempered by the male-dominated art world and societal norms of her time, but she was in a unique position to contribute to the rise of the one the most recognizable and well-known art movements – Impressionism.

    What is Impressionism?

    The founding members of Impressionism are names most of us know – Monet, Degas, and Pissarro to name a few. Although their individual styles varied, as a group their work rejected the established styles typically shown at the annual Salon de Paris. (The Salon was an exhibition that was considered to be essential to the success of an artist.) From its beginnings in the 1860s, Impressionism brought new ideas, genres, and advancements in the art world.

    The style is comprised of loose brushstrokes, described by conservative critics of the time as sketchy and unfinished. Others saw it as a modern take, noting the bright, unblended colors that stood in contrast to the more traditional contemporary works seen at the Salon. Shadows were rendered in color rather than neutrals, and old yellow varnishes were traded in for unvarnished works that allowed newer, brighter colors to shine. 

    This new way of painting also changed the way the subject matter was viewed. Earlier works were carefully composed, static images. Impressionist pieces captured a moment, as fleeting as each brushstroke that created the composition. The subject matter itself was also different. Where contemporary pieces were often religious-themed, Impressionism depicted everyday life  and traded the controlled environment of the art studio for plein air (open air, or outside) painting. 

    salon de paris 1849

    By Theodor Josef Hubert Hoffbauer – This image is available from the Brown University Library under the digital ID 1189455725390625., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=24755293

    Berthe Morisot’s Early Life

    Berthe Morisot was born on January 14, 1841. Her father was a wealthy civil servant and her mother was related to the well-known Rococo painter Jean-Honoré Fragonard. Morisot and her sister Edma showed a talent for painting and studied at the Louvre under painter Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot (women were not allowed to pursue a formal arts education). Although Edna gave up her artistic ambitions to marry a naval officer, Berthe continued to paint. She met Édouard Manet during her studies at the Louvre and they formed a lasting friendship. 

    As a result, she was uniquely positioned to pursue her art career. She was not able to frequent the cafes and studios where male artists could congregate and exchange ideas because women’s roles in society were so strictly defined. However, her friendship with Manet and eventual marriage to his brother Eugène gave her access to the art world and connections with other artists that most women didn’t have. She became friends with some of the major players of the Impressionist movement including Renoir, Degas, Pissarro, and Monet. 

    Berthe Morisot With a Bouquet of Violets. Edouard Manet. 1872.

    Berthe Morisot With a Bouquet of Violets. Edouard Manet. 1872.

    What Set Berthe Morisot Apart?  

    It wouldn’t be fair to reduce Morisot to her status and connections. She was a talented artist that went under-recognized even until the last few years. Much has already been written on how gender and society shaped her career and how it’s been perceived over the years. Honestly, I don’t think I’ll do it the justice it deserves in this little blog post. Rather, let’s look at the work itself. 

    Under the tutelage of Corot, Morisot learned to paint landscapes and earned herself a spot in the Salon starting in 1864. Despite having this prestige for the following decade, she ended up destroying many of her works dating before 1869. (If trashing old work isn’t relatable as an artist, I don’t know what is.)

    The Mother and Sister of the Artist. Berthe Morisot. ca. 1869

    The Mother and Sister of the Artist. Berthe Morisot. ca. 1869

    In 1874, Morisot participated in the first independent Impressionist show along with Degas, Renoir, and Monet.  By this time her work had become looser, with the short, quick brushstrokes that came to define the style. The show was described by a critic as consisting of “five or six lunatics of which one is a woman…whose feminine grace is maintained amid the outpourings of a delirious mind.” She would go on to show at the Impressionist exhibition every year, except for the year her daughter was born, for the rest of her life. 

    Hanging the Laundry out to Dry. Berthe Morisot. 1875.

    Hanging the Laundry out to Dry. Berthe Morisot. 1875. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D. C., online collection, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3732827

    Subject and Style

    Female artists of the time tended to paint depictions of what they had access to – daily life. Women were not allowed to work from models in studios as men did. Berthe Morisot was no exception. While this was limiting, the female point of view offered an intimate look into the domestic lives of women. Whether it was a mother cradling her child, women taking tea, or a girl brushing her hair – the Impressionist viewpoint such personal scenes was the perfect application to capture the moment. It implies the movement of the sip of tea or a twinkle in the eye, sometimes with a single stroke of color. 

    Morisot was particularly talented at capturing energy of the fleeting moment, where the thick strokes of paint create additional depth with their texture, still appearing wet – something that can only be appreciated in real life. 

    Woman at her Toilette. Berthe Morisot. 1875-1880.

    Woman at her Toilette. Berthe Morisot. 1875-1880.

    Over the course of her career, Morisot worked with oil, watercolor, and pastels. Her start was in drawing and she gravitated back to it later in her career, experimenting with colored pencils and charcoal. Her work as a whole also began to take on some of the definition seen in her early work. In 1894 she painted a striking portrait of her daughter Julie that stands in stark contrast to the loose brushwork of her other paintings. The definition of the young woman’s face is made all the more apparent by the simple background. 

    Julie Daydreaming. Berthe Morisot. 1894.

    Julie Daydreaming. Berthe Morisot. 1894.

    There’s no way to know what direction Berthe Morisot’s work would have taken next. She passed away on March 2, 1895 at the age of 54. It would be over 100 years before the public would begin to truly recognize her contributions to the art world, and even now she is still written about as a “female artist” rather than simply an artist. While the impact society had on her progress as an artist cannot be ignored, the truth is that even critics of her time acknowledged her work as being better than her peers.

    Sources:

    https://www.artnews.com/art-news/artists/berthe-morisot-who-is-she-why-is-she-important-1234581283/

    https://www.biography.com/artist/berthe-morisot

    Chadwick, Whitney. Women, Art, and Society. https://www.amazon.com/Women-Art-Society-World/dp/050020456X/

    https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/imml/hd_imml.htm

  • New Year, New Projects!

    New Year, New Projects!

    Happy New Year! Whether celebrating or sleeping through it, I hope we get an amazing start this year. The bar may be low, but we can clear it!

    Now that the holiday season is over, some of us will be making resolutions and plans while others will be saying to hell with it all. I did a post last year about all the stuff I was going to do. I’m not going to go back and read it because I don’t think I made it very far into my plan… 

    This year will be different! Maybe. At least there will be more of a plan? 

    At any rate, it’s something I’ve talked about on stream here and there and I’m super excited about it! Are you ready? We are doing: 

    Artist of the Month!

    (pause for effect)

    I know right?? For each month this year I’ve picked an artist born in that month. I’m going to put my Art History degree to work and write up a little something about each artist. 

    But wait! There’s more! Don’t worry, I’m not gonna make you *just* read and learn stuff. 

    There will also be a project for each artist of the month where I make a piece related to their work, whether it be in their style, a similar subject matter, or maybe a portrait of the artist. 

    To kick of the new year, we’re going to start with French artist Berthe Morisot. She was a pioneer of Impressionist art during a time when women were still heavily constrained by social norms. Her contributions have only begun to be truly recognized in the past few years – more than 100 years after her untimely death. 

    berthe morisot portrait

    Photo of Berthe Morisot. Source: Wikipedia

    I plan to paint a digital portrait in the impressionist style using a custom color set and custom brushes to capture the dynamic strokes and colorful shading that helped define the style. 

    It was hard to choose artists for the list because there are so many directions to take a project like this. I ultimately decided to pick names that people may recognize without going so big that’s it’s been done to death. Sorry, Van Gogh. Not sorry Picasso. Maybe we’ll talk about them another time. Maybe someday I’ll be able to do more than one each month (that’d be so cool!). 

    January is Berthe Morisot month. I’ll talk about her more in the next post and do another after the project is done. I’m pretty sure I know what I want the painting to be, but I’m not going to say yet. You’ll have to tune in to see. 

    Thank you for reading. Thank you for going on this little adventure with me. I can’t wait to see how this turns out! 

  • Bookbinding Doesn’t Take that Long

    Bookbinding Doesn’t Take that Long

    Well, it shouldn’t, but it did for me and not for the reasons you might think. I started my handmade sketchbook adventure back in January when I decided that I wanted one with all different types of paper in it. That’s not something you can zip over to the art store and buy (why not??), so I took it as an opportunity to make something really personal. I thought I did that last year when I converted an old (and meaningful) art book into a journal, but after a year of filling it up it still isn’t quite what I want. 

    What Happened?

    So I started the book months ago with plans for three types of paper (drawing, multimedia, and watercolor) and a cover made from my son’s old jeans that were too holy to donate. Of course, it all had to be filmed so I could make a video out of it! Everything was all set up – lights, camera, computer, and bookbinding supplies took over my dining room table. During the first session I cut all of the paper to size and gently creased and stacked it into signatures of one of each type of paper. 

    And there it all sat. The whole time I wondered what it was, why I wouldn’t just sit down and work on it. It’s pretty obvious now though, right? It was that extra step of making the video. Rather that just sit down and put all the effort into making the book, the video was what really had priority. My excuse was what a pain it would be to get set up and get going even though most of what I needed was left out. And because of that dinners at the table didn’t happen for months. Family crafting didn’t get done at the table. There was an eyesore in the middle of my house! 

    Last week I finally took the camera set up down and put the bookbinding project away in its own special box. Guess what happened? We ate some food at the table and did some projects together. Then I finished the book – in two days. Mistakes were made, but I feel like since they’re baked into the book already that there’s no point in worrying too much about what goes into it. That first page of a sketchbook is always the toughest!

    How I Made the Book

    The tutorial I followed can be found below. It’s really easy to adapt your own measurements and I found the whole process to be very relaxing, except for the very end where I realized the cover was too big and I already put glue down. I snapped a few pics along the way, because it still needed to be documented, so rather than make you read more of my rambles, let’s go on a little photo journey together!

    A pretty stack of signatures ready to be sewn!

    This is a beautified version of what my table looked like for MONTHS, except without holes punched in the signatures. How long did it take to measure and punch those holes? Maybe 10 minutes. At least I was able to get any bitterness about it over with right away. 🙂

    I thought sewing the signatures together would be tedious, but it was very relaxing! It was kind of my favorite part. <3

    The signatures all stitched and ready for glue.
    Signatures glued and clamped.

    I have no control over where glue goes. It’s a miracle that none of it got on the pages! That’s a paint stirrer cut in half and two-inch clamps to keep it all together.

    I set them out to dry like this. I forget why. Maybe to make sure they dried evenly? It must have worked because they did. 🙂

    Signatures glued, clamped, and drying.
    The cover pieces all laid out.

    The cover is made out of my son’s old jeans and chipboard.

    The Result!

    There aren’t any pics of the fiasco that was gluing all the things together, but this is how it looks now. I sewed denim strips on and left the edges out so it would fray over time and have a nice distressed look. Plus it’s kind of relaxing picking at the little strings as they come loose. I finished it off with a patch from Alex Pardee. 🙂

    At the end of the day, bookbinding is fun!

    The tutorial I used: https://thepostmansknock.com/bookbinding-tutorial-by-jessica-of-greenleaf-and-blueberry/

    If you don’t know him, now you know him. You’re welcome. 🙂 http://www.alexpardee.com

    Thanks for reading! Until next time!